What is a notable restriction on using drive stuns with CEWs?

Drive stuns with Conducted Energy Weapons (CEWs), such as the Taser 7, are primarily intended as a last resort method for gaining compliance from a subject who is not responding to verbal commands or other forms of de-escalation. The notable restriction regarding the use of drive stuns is that they must not be used if compliance is unlikely. This principle is pivotal as it ensures that the application of force is proportionate, reasonable, and justified under the circumstances.

Using drive stuns in situations where compliance is deemed unlikely could escalate tensions or exacerbate the situation, potentially leading to further resistance or harm. It is essential for law enforcement to assess the likelihood of compliance before resorting to this method, as its effectiveness can be limited depending on the subject's physical condition, environment, and mindset.

In contrast, the other options suggest practices or beliefs that do not align with safe or standardized use of CEWs. Repeating drive stuns for effectiveness may not yield the intended compliance and can lead to unnecessary escalation, while claiming there are no limitations on their use contradicts the principles of proportionality and necessity in force application. The notion that drive stuns are always ineffective disregards the fact that they can be useful in some scenarios but